Aerosols in the Dental Office: Best Practices for Patient and Practitioner Safety
Course Number: 619
Course Contents
Antiseptic Rinses
Preprocedural rinses have been shown to reduce overall salivary and aerosol microbial loads.110 It was, therefore, proposed that the use of antimicrobial mouthrinses, including hydrogen peroxide, chlorhexidine gluconate, cetylpyridium chloride, and/or povidone iodine could be used to reduce overall numbers of SARS-CoV-2 viral particles in saliva. In vitro evidence does suggest that oral antiseptics may have efficacy to eliminate SARS-CoV-2 viral particles through a variety of mechanisms111, but in vivo studies have failed to show statistically significant benefit.112 Table 3 summarizes the effects of various common antiseptic mouthrinses on SARS-CoV-2. It should be noted that for all of the antiseptics described, rinsing for at least 30 seconds is necessary to see viricidal results.111
Table 3: Mechanism of Action of Oral Antiseptics Against SARS-CoV-2111
Antiseptic Type | Antimicrobial Mechanism of Action Agains SARS-CoV-2 | Viral Disruption |
---|---|---|
Hydrogen Peroxide |
Production of hydroxyl free radicals Oxygen release Damage lipids, proteins, and viral DNA | Destabilization and disruption of the viral envelope after mouthrinsing for at least 30 seconds |
Povidone Iodine |
Release of iodine Formation of pores in the cell membrane Inhibition of exo and endotoxins RNA oxidation | |
Chlorhexidine Gluconate |
Binding to membrane phospholipids Alteration of osmotic regulation Loss of structural stability Displacement of viral protein cations by anion exchange | |
Cetyl Pyridium Chloride |
Displacement of magnesium and calcium cations Exit of cytoplasmic components Membrane solubilization Reduced viral gene transcription |